10 Reasons
Why Britain Should Leave the EU

euro Cringe

Sources of Information
Articles
News Sources
News Archives

Web Sites
Speeches

Channels
European Constitution (IGC)
Euro
Regions

Fishing

Action
Support
Meet
Buy

Share
Mailing Lists

eurosceptic.com
Add Your Website URL
Report a Dead URL
Recommend this Site

Britain facing the crunch on European integration
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Daily Telegraph - 07/12/2002

While Tony Blair grapples with the euro, a more immediate problem is looming in Brussels where the Convention on the Future of Europe appears to be going horribly wrong for Britain.

Within six months he may have to choose between a highly integrated Europe that is anathema to many Britons, or precipitate a full-blown crisis with the European Union.

Andrew Duff, a Liberal Democrat MEP and leading federalist, said the Government had misjudged the importance of the convention, a 105-strong body of MPs, MEPs and ministers from the 15 EU states and 13 candidate countries that is expected to draft a European constitution by June.

France, Germany and Spain have all appointed foreign ministers with decades of EU experience to lead their teams on the convention, endowing the final result with irrefutable authority - even if the draft text is not legally-binding.

Downing Street, which initially pooh-poohed the forum as a talking shop, is still making do with a monolingual Brussels novice Peter Hain, the Welsh Secretary.

"Peter Hain has got an awful lot to learn about the workings of the EU, and that is about as polite as I can be," said Mr Duff, who predicted that Britain was approaching final "crunch-time" in its stormy relations with Europe.

Valery Giscard d'Estaing, the convention's president, has said no country would be able to block the final outcome. Recalcitrant states would have to leave the EU instead.

The Foreign Office calculates that France will in the end join forces to crush any serious attempt to emasculate the powers of Europe's sovereign nations. But the great shock in recent weeks has been French willingness to sign up to a series of ultra-federalist proposals with Germany.

Yesterday the convention debated Franco-German proposals for an EU justice ministry backed by a powerful EU police agency and a harmonised system of criminal law.

Describing judicial union as "the next ambitious stage in the European construction, after the single market and the euro", the joint document calls for a European prosecutor with the power to launch inquiries into cross-border crime.

The EU's police agency, Europol, would become a "coercive European authority" along the lines of the FBI with powers to run investigations.

All serious crimes that impinge on the collective interest would become a "community competence". The European Court would acquire oversight over law and order.

This followed a joint proposal last month for an EU defence union, including a Euro-army with an "integrated command capability" independent of Nato and a "European Armaments Agency".

A separate Franco-German text is to call for the abolition of the national veto over taxation.

The Earl of Stockton, a pro-European Tory MEP on the convention, accused its key working groups on defence and judicial affairs of ignoring dissenting views from British, Irish, and Scandinavian members, and in some cases falsifying documents to suggest uncontested support for federalist proposals.

He said: "I have come to the conclusion that the Commission has been working behind the scenes with the French and Germans to push for a very integrationist constitution that goes far beyond anything acceptable to Britain.

"We're talking about an EU takeover of social legislation, law enforcement and justice, with the European Parliament turning into something like the US Congress."

British officials dismissed such views as unduly alarmist.

The Eurosceptic Portal
Site Hosted by on-line-solutions.co.uk